Matriz de decisión ponderadaNuevo

Compara opciones según pesos y requisitos obligatorios, revisa puntuaciones faltantes y sensibilidad, y exporta un registro de decisión verificable

Esta herramienta no está traducida por completo; parte del contenido usa el idioma de origen o uno de reserva.

Checking local recovery and shared data…

Decision question

Define must-have conditions and distinct preferences before rating alternatives. Want scores run from 1 (weaker) to 5 (stronger); zero / blank means unrated, not neutral. Express costs as aligned criteria such as affordability.

Alternatives (2/40)

Option 1

Option 2

Criteria (3/20)

1Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

2Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

3Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

Scores and evidence

Option 1

Criterion 1Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 2Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 3Score evidence / uncertainty

Option 2

Criterion 1Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 2Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 3Score evidence / uncertainty

Human review: trade-offs, risks and tentative conclusionReview date

In alternatives or criteria, Ctrl/⌘+Enter adds and Alt+Delete removes. Scores, evidence, clearing and loading can be undone. CSV contains the scoring matrix; Markdown / JSON retain evidence and review notes.

6 ratings / checks remain. Only fully rated options meeting every Must receive a rank.

Method boundaries and references

Inspirado en la distinción Must / Want de Kepner–Tregoe: comprobar primero los requisitos y luego ponderar las preferencias. Esta herramienta usa una escala de 1 a 5 como apoyo para el debate, no es la implementación completa del método original ni una escala científica. Las puntuaciones desconocidas no entran en la clasificación de opciones completas; una proporción no es una probabilidad de éxito. Conviene revisar aparte los criterios duplicados, la calidad de las pruebas, los mínimos no compensables y los riesgos; la decisión la toman las personas.

Kepner-Tregoe — Decision Analysis: Musts and Wants FHWA — Work Zone Road User Costs, Chapter 3

Local storage is not a backup and can be cleared by the browser. JSON restores all fields. Share links are not encrypted; do not include sensitive data.

Cargando herramienta…

Guía

Matriz de decisión ponderadaNuevo

Compara opciones según pesos y requisitos obligatorios, revisa puntuaciones faltantes y sensibilidad, y exporta un registro de decisión verificable

Esta herramienta no está traducida por completo; parte del contenido usa el idioma de origen o uno de reserva.

Checking local recovery and shared data…

Decision question

Alternatives (2/40)

Option 1

Option 2

Criteria (3/20)

1Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

2Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

3Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

Scores and evidence

Option 1

Criterion 1Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 2Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 3Score evidence / uncertainty

Option 2

Criterion 1Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 2Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 3Score evidence / uncertainty

Human review: trade-offs, risks and tentative conclusionReview date

6 ratings / checks remain. Only fully rated options meeting every Must receive a rank.

Method boundaries and references

Kepner-Tregoe — Decision Analysis: Musts and Wants FHWA — Work Zone Road User Costs, Chapter 3

Local storage is not a backup and can be cleared by the browser. JSON restores all fields. Share links are not encrypted; do not include sensitive data.