重み付き決定マトリクス新着

重みと必須条件で候補を比較し、評価の抜けや感度を確認。検証可能な意思決定記録を書き出せます

このツールの翻訳は未完了です。一部は原文または代替言語で表示されます。

Checking local recovery and shared data…

Decision question

Define must-have conditions and distinct preferences before rating alternatives. Want scores run from 1 (weaker) to 5 (stronger); zero / blank means unrated, not neutral. Express costs as aligned criteria such as affordability.

Alternatives (2/40)

Option 1

Option 2

Criteria (3/20)

1Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

2Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

3Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

Scores and evidence

Option 1

Criterion 1Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 2Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 3Score evidence / uncertainty

Option 2

Criterion 1Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 2Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 3Score evidence / uncertainty

Human review: trade-offs, risks and tentative conclusionReview date

In alternatives or criteria, Ctrl/⌘+Enter adds and Alt+Delete removes. Scores, evidence, clearing and loading can be undone. CSV contains the scoring matrix; Markdown / JSON retain evidence and review notes.

6 ratings / checks remain. Only fully rated options meeting every Must receive a rank.

Method boundaries and references

Kepner–Tregoe の Must / Want の考え方を参考にしています。必須条件を先に確認し、その後に希望条件を重み付けします。本ツールは議論しやすい 1–5 の尺度を用いますが、原手法の完全な実装でも科学的な尺度でもありません。未入力の評価は完全な選択肢の順位には入りません。割合は成功確率ではありません。重複した評価軸、根拠の質、補償できない最低条件とリスクは別途確認し、結論は人が下してください。

Kepner-Tregoe — Decision Analysis: Musts and Wants FHWA — Work Zone Road User Costs, Chapter 3

Local storage is not a backup and can be cleared by the browser. JSON restores all fields. Share links are not encrypted; do not include sensitive data.

ツールを読み込み中…

説明

重み付き決定マトリクス新着

重みと必須条件で候補を比較し、評価の抜けや感度を確認。検証可能な意思決定記録を書き出せます

このツールの翻訳は未完了です。一部は原文または代替言語で表示されます。

Checking local recovery and shared data…

Decision question

Alternatives (2/40)

Option 1

Option 2

Criteria (3/20)

1Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

2Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

3Criterion nameMust have (switching clears this column’s scores and evidence)Weight 1–5

Scores and evidence

Option 1

Criterion 1Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 2Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 3Score evidence / uncertainty

Option 2

Criterion 1Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 2Score evidence / uncertainty

Criterion 3Score evidence / uncertainty

Human review: trade-offs, risks and tentative conclusionReview date

6 ratings / checks remain. Only fully rated options meeting every Must receive a rank.

Method boundaries and references

Kepner-Tregoe — Decision Analysis: Musts and Wants FHWA — Work Zone Road User Costs, Chapter 3

Local storage is not a backup and can be cleared by the browser. JSON restores all fields. Share links are not encrypted; do not include sensitive data.